<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6864">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6864</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6883" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6882" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6881" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6880" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T15:46:54Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6883">
    <title>The Principle of Contradiction: Nyāya and Western Logic</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6883</link>
    <description>Title: The Principle of Contradiction: Nyāya and Western Logic
Authors: Shaw, J. L.
Description: PP:1-6</description>
    <dc:date>2023-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6882">
    <title>Being and Nothingness in Indian thinking since RgVeda to Nagarjuna</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6882</link>
    <description>Title: Being and Nothingness in Indian thinking since RgVeda to Nagarjuna
Authors: Bilimoria, Purushottama
Abstract: The paper is an inquiry on the concept of non-being and its permutations&#xD;
of nothing in the Indian intellectual tradition. It begins by asking&#xD;
whether there is anything close to the idea of creatio ex nihilo in the&#xD;
Ṛgveda down to the later Brahmāṇic protagonists vis-à-vis the Śramanic&#xD;
antagonists, in particular in the Jain and Buddhist darśanas. Here&#xD;
Nāgārjuna’s nuanced dialectic of emptiness is prevailed to problematize&#xD;
and complicate further the already troubled status of being/Being in the&#xD;
Indic tradition and erosion made by the rise of non-being/nothingness,&#xD;
and of course the doctrine of Śūnyatā (Emptiness). The paper ends with&#xD;
some consideration of the responses to the afore-mentioned challneges&#xD;
from the doyens of Vedānta, namely, Śaṅkara abd Rāmānuja.
Description: PP:7-16</description>
    <dc:date>2023-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6881">
    <title>Logic of Paryāpti Relation in Navya Nyāya</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6881</link>
    <description>Title: Logic of Paryāpti Relation in Navya Nyāya
Authors: Ghosh, Raghunath
Abstract: A novel relation called paryāpti has been accepted by the Navya&#xD;
Naiyāyikas for explaining certain cases, which are inexplicable&#xD;
through other relations. This relation is accepted to justify cognition of&#xD;
a property remaining in conjoint objects (vyāsajyavṛttidharma). The&#xD;
term paryāpta means ‘that which does neither exist in less places nor&#xD;
more places’ (anyūṇānatirikta). The property - ‘two-ness’ (dvitva)&#xD;
exists sufficiently or completely or pervadingly in two substances&#xD;
(dvitvaṁ dvayoḥ paryāptam). In the expression - ‘The blue jar is not&#xD;
there’ (nīlo ghaṭo nāsti), the absentee (pratiyogī) is ‘a blue jar’ (nīlo&#xD;
ghaṭaḥ) and the limitors of the absenteeness (pratiyogitāvacchedaka)&#xD;
are both blueness (nīlatva) and jarness (ghaṭatva). The property of&#xD;
being a limitor of an absenteeness (pratiyogitāvacchedaka) remains in&#xD;
both ‘blueness’ (nīlatva) and ‘jarness’ (ghaṭatva) simultaneously&#xD;
through relation called paryāptī. A distinction has also been shown&#xD;
between samavāya and paryāpti.
Description: PP:17-23</description>
    <dc:date>2023-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6880">
    <title>Changing Nature of Yoga through the Ages</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/6880</link>
    <description>Title: Changing Nature of Yoga through the Ages
Authors: Betal, Chintaharan
Abstract: Introduction: When the history of yoga studied carefully, it has been&#xD;
conspicuous that the nature of yoga undergone a variety of changes from&#xD;
the remote antiquity to its present stage of development. Objective:&#xD;
Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the facts to unveil&#xD;
how the nature of yoga has changed along with the change of ages.&#xD;
Methods: The qualitative data for study was collected from the findings&#xD;
of various researches as well as textual evidences of associated fields and&#xD;
an analytical and descriptive method was adopted for analyzing the&#xD;
collected data. Results: In the course of evolutionary phases of yoga,&#xD;
Austric, Dravidians and Aryans contributed a lot for shaping and&#xD;
moulding the nature of ancient yoga. Besides, the worship of mystic&#xD;
power, concept of mother-goddess and father-god, the evolution of&#xD;
yantra, mantra and tantra along with the impact of physical, socio-cultural&#xD;
as well as psychological factors have greatly been contributed in shaping&#xD;
and changing the nature of yoga through the ages. At the beginning of&#xD;
creation, the purpose of yoga was primarily ‘mundane’ rather than&#xD;
spiritual and the spiritual development at that time was only a secondary&#xD;
purpose. In the later ancient time, the sole nature of yoga practice was to&#xD;
attain ‘spirituality’ whereas in the medieval period; the nature of yoga&#xD;
transformed into a ‘mystical nature’. Similarly, in the early modern&#xD;
period, yoga came out of the mysticism and evolved as a ‘scientific’&#xD;
subject with ‘social’ and ‘public nature. In the modern period, yoga has&#xD;
emerged as a ‘therapeutic subject’ and in addition to this, yoga also held&#xD;
its ‘commercial nature’. Discussion: The study noticed that the entire&#xD;
concept, structure and nature of yoga have undergone an incredible&#xD;
changes in modern times and specifically, during the last sixty years (i.e.,&#xD;
from1960 AD to till the date). Conclusion: Thus, the study concluded&#xD;
that Yoga has achieved a variety of identities which have been accepted&#xD;
in different ways at different times throughout the course of its&#xD;
development.
Description: PP:24-33</description>
    <dc:date>2023-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

