<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5749">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5749</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5890" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5889" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5879" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5878" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T21:27:43Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5890">
    <title>Contesting Humanism(s) in a Humanist Cause: Musings on Three  Kinds of Antihumanist Challenges</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5890</link>
    <description>Title: Contesting Humanism(s) in a Humanist Cause: Musings on Three  Kinds of Antihumanist Challenges
Authors: George, Jibu Mathew
Abstract: Against  the  backdrop  of  myriad  antihumanist  challenges  that  are  current  in  the &#xD;
contemporary  theoretical  climate,  this  article  distinguishes  between  and  discusses  three &#xD;
kinds of such challenges to the received discourse of humanism. The first is the counterdiscursive contestation  of universalistic claims  of Western  humanism on behalf of those &#xD;
subtly  excluded  from  and  subdued  by  this  discourse.  The  second  is  a  critique  of  the &#xD;
tropology of the human with the aim of unraveling illusory autonomies and helping human &#xD;
subjects  to  attain  (or  regain)  their  subjectivity.  The  third  involves  analyzing  the &#xD;
implications  of  redefining  the  human  in  the  transhumanist/posthumanist  context  of &#xD;
scientific-technological  developments,  many  of  which  are  comparatively  too  recent  to &#xD;
have  been  factored  in  by  the  conceptual  challenges  mounted  earlier.  The  article &#xD;
foregrounds the paradoxical possibility of ser ving the humanist cause  even as one contests &#xD;
received conceptions of the human as a category.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5889">
    <title>“Volcanic Evidence” in D. H. Lawrence’s Letters and Works</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5889</link>
    <description>Title: “Volcanic Evidence” in D. H. Lawrence’s Letters and Works
Authors: Bricout, Shirley
Abstract: This  article  proposes  to  examine  how  volcanoes  fired  D.  H.  Lawrence’s  imagination &#xD;
throughout  his  works  and  letters.  As  he  travelled  the  globe,  the  majesty  and  power  of &#xD;
volcanoes  inspired  the  writer  beautiful  picturesque  descriptions  of  landscapes,  however &#xD;
these always blend with allusions to a more primitive world. References to Greco-Roman &#xD;
mythology,  as  in Sea  and  Sardinia,  express  in  gendered  terms  the  author’s  ambivalent &#xD;
relationship  to  volcanoes  and  the  cultures  and  places  associated  with  them.  In Sea  and &#xD;
Sardinia, these narrative choices infuse the written farewell to Etna with words of Greek &#xD;
origin, in such a way that the effect of the magnetism of the volcano is felt on Lawrence’s &#xD;
language too.&#xD;
Moreover, Lawrence’s language is, like molten lava, maintained in ebullient flux &#xD;
as varying shades of meaning turn the literal volcanic features into  metaphors to express &#xD;
moods, as in the poem “Volcanic Eruption” devoted to a woman, and to depict conflicts, &#xD;
as  in Kangaroo and The  Plumed  Serpent.  Indeed,  making  ample  use  of  Nietzsche’s &#xD;
metaphor of “eruption”, Lawrence  extends  his  idea of the “spirit  of place” to volcanoes &#xD;
whose paradigms provide imagery to convey his own views on Western civilization. For &#xD;
instance,  the  poem  “Peace”,  written  in  Sicily  in  1920,  explores  in  volcanic  terms  the &#xD;
effervescent passions stirring within men and society. It is nevertheless in Kangaroo that &#xD;
the  narrative  itself  is  fragmented  when  newspaper  cuttings  about  volcanoes  are  inserted &#xD;
with other news items to convey the character’s swaying moods and hesitations.&#xD;
Thus,  in  Lawrence’s  oeuvre,  volcanoes  and  lava  can  be  said  to  epitomize &#xD;
Modernist experimental writing through the motifs of expulsion, fragmentation and flux.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5879">
    <title>Home and Identity for the Bengali in Northeast India:  Siddhartha Deb’s The Point of Return</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5879</link>
    <description>Title: Home and Identity for the Bengali in Northeast India:  Siddhartha Deb’s The Point of Return
Authors: Dev Ray, Abantika
Abstract: Displacement  and  identity  crisis  resulting  from  Partition  affected  people  of  undivided &#xD;
India immensely. The loss of ‘home’ and land which led to this crisis became eternal to &#xD;
the postcolonial experience of Bengalis on the eastern side of the border. This search for &#xD;
‘home’ was the only way  to recover their identity. This paper will study the postcolonial &#xD;
Bengali yearning for a ‘home’ and the stability it embodies through Siddhartha Deb’s The &#xD;
Point of Return. It will also look at how Bengalis bore the brunt of Khasi  sub-nationalism &#xD;
that added to their identity crisis and strengthened their desire for a ‘home’ of their own.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5878">
    <title>Chaos, Fractal &amp; Elusive Formula for the Future: A Reading of  Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia</title>
    <link>https://ir.vidyasagar.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/5878</link>
    <description>Title: Chaos, Fractal &amp; Elusive Formula for the Future: A Reading of  Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
Authors: Pal, Amitava
Abstract: Tom  Stoppard  announced  his  arrival  on  the  British  theatre  with  his  breakthrough  play &#xD;
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead  in 1966. Since he appeared towards the fag-end of &#xD;
the theatre of the absurd era, he did at once imbibe and depart from the core tenets of the &#xD;
absurd worldview. One interesting point that early Stoppardian plays often explore is the &#xD;
question  of  free  will  versus  determinism.  This  question  becomes  further  intriguing  in &#xD;
mature  Stoppard.  While  free  will  is  often  disallowed  a  free  run,  the  path  of  inevitable &#xD;
predictability becomes  more  of a question  mark. Stoppard largely resolves this perennial &#xD;
conflict in his unique way in his 1993 play  Arcadia. This resolution is aided by otherwise &#xD;
non-theatrical ideas  –  ideas which primarily pertain to the  world of science and geometry. &#xD;
This  article  would  decipher  the  layers  of  Chaos  theory,  fractals,  Fermat's  Last Theorem, &#xD;
iterated  algorithm  et  al,  and  zero  in  on  how  these  scientific  concepts  are  integrated  by &#xD;
Stoppard into not only the content, but also the form of the play.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

